| ER Models | ERM References | ERM Anthologies |
| Model No. | 66 | |||
| Short Citation | (Wei/Teorey 1991) | |||
| Year | 1991 | |||
| Special Name | ORAC | |||
| Descendant of | (Teorey et al. 1989) | |||
| Constructs | Inherent | Entity Type | r: abstract objects | |
| Relationship Type | sg: generalization, categorization, aggregation, min/max | |||
| Value Sets / Attributes | r: literal objects, sg: complex, multivalued, surrogate keys, sg/l: role | |||
| New | Invented | Adapted | constraint primitives | |
| Included | ||||
| Borrowed | Included | |||
| Added | ||||
| Syntactic Rules | Constraint primitives connected to relationship types. | |||
| Semantics | formal | |||
| Focus | g | |||
| Data Definition | ||||
| Data Manipulation | ||||
| Remarks | ||||
| Cause | Citation | ... answer these criticisms [concerning the ER model]... (p. 32). ... humanly intuitive, semantically expressive, and can be mapped into simple mathematical concepts (p. 32). | ||
| Content | Expressiveness | |||
| Applicability | X | |||
| Correction | X | |||
| Integration | ||||
| Implementation | (X) | |||
| Other | ||||
| Alternative Publications | ||||
| Binary Vector | Structure/General | [E1] | 1 | |
| [E2] | 1 | |||
| [E3] | i | |||
| [E4] | ||||
| [E5] | ||||
| [E6] | ||||
| Structure/Integrity | [E7] | 1 | ||
| [E8] | 1 | |||
| [E9] | 1 | |||
| [E10] | 1 | |||
| [E11] | 1 | |||
| [E12] | 1 | |||
| [E13] | 1 | |||
| [E14] | i | |||
| [E15] | ||||
| [E16] | ||||
| Behavior | [E17] | |||
| [E18] | ||||
| Application | [E19] | |||
| [E20] | ||||
| [E21] | ||||
| [E22] | ||||
| [E23] | ||||
| [E24] | ||||
| [E25] | ||||
| [E26] | ||||
| [E27] | ||||
| Domain-Specifics | [E28] | |||
| [E29] | ||||
| [E30] | ||||
| [E31] | ||||
| [E32] | ||||
| [E33] | ||||
| Expressiveness Values | Total | 0.33 | ||
| Data Model | 0.61 | |||
| Application | 0.00 | |||
| Domain Specifics | 0.00 | |||
| Partially Redundant Constructs | Conjunctive Concepts | S | ||
| Linked Concepts | ||||